Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Landmark Ruling Affirms Equal Rights for Married Daughters in Compassionate Appointments

In a historic judgment, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has redefined family rights, emphasizing that daughters remain part of their parents’ family for life—regardless of marital status. This decision came as Justice K. Manmadha Rao ruled on a writ petition challenging the denial of a compassionate appointment to a married daughter whose father, a temple sweeper, passed away in 2013. The court directed temple authorities to appoint the petitioner in her father’s role or in a suitable post, ensuring she receives all associated service benefits, though the ruling excludes monetary compensation for past service under the “no work-no pay” principle.

Justice Rao strongly condemned the outdated 1999 state policy that differentiated between married daughters and sons in compassionate appointments. “Sons and daughters, whether they are unmarried or married, are part of the family of their parents for their entire life,” stated the High Court, deeming it unfair to exclude a daughter from her parents’ family solely due to marriage.

The petitioner had faced roadblocks in her request for compassionate employment; authorities demanded a divorce certificate, which she was unable to provide as her husband had deserted her. This lack of response from officials led her to move the High Court. Justice Rao’s verdict highlights the discriminatory nature of the policy, noting that a married daughter, unlike a married son, is unjustly considered ineligible solely due to marital status. This landmark ruling not only upholds gender equality but also challenges discriminatory practices, marking a progressive step towards women’s rights in India.