Engineering Student Demands ₹1.1 Crore Over Phone Number Mishap in Amaran

In an unexpected turn of events, a Chennai-based engineering student, Vaageesan, has found himself at the center of a legal battle with the filmmakers of Amaran. The issue? A phone number shown in a pivotal scene of the film allegedly resembles his own, leading to a barrage of unwelcome calls from moviegoers.

The controversy stems from a scene where Sai Pallavi’s character scribbles a phone number on a crumpled piece of paper. While one digit of the number appears unclear, the visible portion reportedly matches Vaageesan’s real contact details. Fans, believing the number to be that of Sai Pallavi, began dialing it incessantly.

Impact on Vaageesan

Vaageesan claims the constant calls have turned his life upside down, disrupting his studies, sleep, and daily routine. Despite his efforts to reach out to the filmmakers on social media, his pleas went unanswered. Left with no alternative, he has taken legal action, demanding:

1. ₹1.1 crore as compensation for the mental agony and inconvenience caused.
2. The removal or alteration of the phone number in the film.

His lawyer described the ordeal as a violation of personal privacy and an oversight by the filmmakers, resulting in “untold hardships.”

Filmmakers Yet to Respond

As of now, the filmmakers have not issued any statement addressing Vaageesan’s claims or his legal demands. The case has sparked discussions on accountability in the entertainment industry, with many questioning the checks and balances in place to avoid such errors.

Lessons for Filmmakers

This incident highlights the importance of ensuring the use of fictional or non-functional phone numbers in movies. Cases like these are not new—several films in the past have faced backlash for similar mistakes, causing unnecessary trouble for unsuspecting individuals.

Public Reactions

The incident has also caught the attention of social media, with opinions divided:

• Some sympathize with Vaageesan, criticizing the filmmakers for their negligence.
• Others see the demand for ₹1.1 crore as excessive, sparking debates over the extent of compensation in such cases.

Conclusion

While it remains to be seen how the filmmakers will respond, this incident serves as a reminder for the entertainment industry to exercise caution in safeguarding the privacy of individuals inadvertently affected by creative decisions.